These are learning activities suitable for high school or even tertiary level students. It would could be used classes in language, media. film, communication, social students or liberal studies or with student media production teams or campus television stations.
The Fifty People, One Question Approach
The Fifty People, One Question activity would involve having students work in groups to create a video a based on the Fifty People, One Question series of videos. In these videos, people are interviewed in the street and are asked one question. The original video was shot in New Orleans in 2008 by the creative partnership of Crush and Lovely & Deltree; their question was: “By the end of today, what would you wish to happen?”
The team also asked the same question in New York and Brooklyn and in London asked the question “Where do you you wish to wake up tomorrow?” The videos are quite popular and have inspired a series of similar videos such as PostSecret’s: What’s your Secret? (The video set in Ottawa, however, isn’t suitable for secondary school classwork, however, as the interviewees are asked what their favourite curse word is.)
The Fifty People One Question Team is quite happy for others to use their approach and even the same title as long as credit is given with a link back to their website:
50 People One Question: Different Approaches
A much more visual approach was used by BenHaistFilms, who took the general idea and gave it a new spin by having interviewees write and down and physically show their answers to the question.
In the above video, the 50 People, 1 Question concept served not so much as a model to be copied, but as a starting point and as a source of inspiration.
A group of my own students in Hong Kong adapted the approach (they were the ones who noticed the original series of videos). In addition to the in-the-street-interviews, they also conducted sit-down interviews which allowed the interviewees to really talk a lot more and go into greater depth. In this video, the first part of series of short films entitled Dreamers, the students look at CM (a professional session musician, arranger and producer who also goes by the name of CMgroovy) and Chan Yat-kuen (an artist and retired teacher).They also conducted interviews in the street with passers-by and learned how varied our dreams can be.
Because the video was entered in a documentary video competition, they decided not to have a long introduction, but to get to the point almost straight away, starting with the interviewees repeating the question (so the viewer knows pretty much what to expect from the very beginning). Also, much as the students wanted to do the camera-focusing effects, our consumer-grade camcorders didn’t really allow for that. Because the students collected quite a lot of footage, they produced a series of related films. Here is the main video (the other videos are at the end of the article):
The Oral History Approach
The oral history approach was made famous by Studs Terkel, an American historian who interviewed thousands of ordinary people in-depth; he broadcast these interviews over the radio and published them in a collection of books. Often his interviews would have a specific (e.g., Work, Life during the war, etc.). Oral histories help give a voice to people who are often overlooked in textbooks and in media. A lot of work on oral histories in the US, for example, has focused on Mexicans and Mexican-Americans who participated in the the Braceros Program, in which temporary labourers were imported into America between 1947 and 1964.
A student group producing an oral history video would interview one person or a small group of persons get them to talk as much as possible about their experiences. The focus is usually on the interviewee’s personal experiences and their thoughts and feelings on these experiences rather than their thoughts in more general issues or things they were not directly involved with. This kind of project is great in helping young people understand what life was really like during a specific period of time and understand how the world has changed.
Youth oral history projects can also help bring different generations together. Your average teen would rarely if ever have a conversation with an elderly person they weren’t related to. In many of the oral histories I’ve viewed, the interviewees seemed to appreciate the chance to tell their stories to the young interviewers. In the following video, Carey Giudici discusses some of the benefits of cross-generational oral history projects:
Here is an interview that is part of the African American Museum of Iowa’s oral history project, Adult Voices, Children’s Eyes. In the first part of the interview, two woman recount their bitter experiences with discrimination and segregation and then, in the second part, explain how society has changed for the better, why they think it’s changed and how this change makes them feel.
The video activities have several benefits:
- They encourage students to reach out to the community and come into contact with people from all walks of life and/or from different generations.
- They help students develop their confidence and communication skills as they approach potential interviewees.
- They let students listen to different views and challange students to review preconceptions.
- They give students the chance to develop their interpersonal skills as they work in groups to plan, prepare, shoot, edit and publicize the video.
- They can give students inspiration for the further development of their own ideas (The activity could be followed up by written work like writing their own answers to their question and posting it on a class bulletin board or using the video of their oral history interviews as part of a larger research project. It could also be followed up by oral work like presenting their video to the class and reflecting on what they learned by doing the project).
The 50People, 1 Question approach also helps students learn how to anaylse and use film techniques. The original 50 People 1 Question videos give students a framework to build on, not just in terms of the overall format, but also in terms of the shooting style. The creators of the original series of videos created them in a specific style. The videos feature:
- Long introductions (the camera just examines some of the interviewees, creating a feeling of suspense)
- A structure in which tends to start with shorter responses and with more insightful and deeper responses appearing later on in the video
- The interviewer never being heard or seen
- People sometimes being interviewed in pairs, so we can sometimes see reactions to comments
- Some interviewees having their footage being intercut with others, often with some link between the interviews in the content or language)
- Use of establishing shots to give the viewer an idea of the general environment
- The use of background music to set a contemplative mood
- The use of shots of interviewees getting into position and of the camera being positioned and being put into focus along with unfocused
shots and shots of people people partly out of the frame. These shots give the video a sort of guerilla filmmaking shooting-on-the-fly feel that contrasts with the professional-quality clear sound (quite difficult to achieve in a street interview) and very still and clear images
- Extensive use of close-ups
- The use of specific camera techniqes like rack focus (i.e., the focus of the camera gradually changes from foreground to background or vice-versa) and shallow depth of field (e.g., the foreground is clear, while the background is blurry).
If students are interested in making a Fifty People, One Question video, they can first think of a suitable question. The questions in the orginal videos are quite good as they are a little unusual and would help avoid pre-thought-out ‘canned’ answers. The PostSecret video was interesting in that it showed just how much some people are willing to reveal on camera. The two student projects on this page dealt with more straightforward questions, an approach which also seemed to work well.
If students are working on oral history projects, they should think of a question and period of time they would like to focus on (e.g., What was life like for you as a labourer in the Braceros Program?, What was life like for you, as a black person, growing up in America? What was life like for you in Hong Kong during the Japanese occupation?). Another very important consideration is the scope of the study. How many interviews will each student group conduct? Will the whole class focus on a specific theme or will groups be allowed to choose their own area to focus on? Will the students only present the interviews or will they integrate what they have found with other sources? The students might find that their interviewees have other interesting things to talk about, but it would be good to start with one area to focus on and a clear idea of the scope of the project.
As the oral history approach has been used for a long time, there are a lot of supporting materials describing the whole process of conduction oral history interviews. The following website describes this process: dohistory.org/on_your_own/toolkit/oralHistory.html
A detailed downloadable guide is also available from the Smithsonian Institute (this is very useful and it provides samples of release forms and other kinds of documentation like personal information forms): http://www.folklife.si.edu/resources/pdf/interviewingguide.pdf
The following PowerPoint presentation (in video form) video clip gives a detailed overview of the whole process:
This clip, from the University of Leicester, focuses on the technical aspects of the interview (e.g., seating positions, audio recording techniques, cameras angles, lighting, and getting the interview started etc.) and gives examples of good and bad interview techniques:
For both types of projects, students should formally gain the consent of the interviewees by having them sign release forms (an example is here: www.smccd.edu/accounts/brenner/lsci110/OralHistoryReleaseForm.html) and personal information forms.
The Dreamers Video Series
As mentioned before, when the students were working on the Dream in Life video, there was a lot of footage that was left unused. This ectra footage was used to create short standalone videos. The films were directed by Winsome Wong. Maggie Lai, Evangeline Hung, Teresa Ng and Winsome all worked on editing, video-recording and translation. The students were in Form 4 (Grade 10) at SKH Lam Woo Memorial Secondary School and were part of the CMe Creative Media Studio team (cmestudio.wordpress.com/), which I have set up there.
The following video is a kind or remix of the main video, but without the focus on the two main interviewers. It more closely follows the 50 People 1 Question format.
We came across these two skateboarding brothers while on our way to the Academy of Performing Arts to interview CM, the musician in the main video.
In the next short video in the series, one of the teachers at our school, Grace Sze, discusses another kind of dream—that more people would be able to experience a very close relationship with Christ. Her video interview is a kind of Chrisitian witness in which she describes how she found faith in God.
The fourth videos features four exchange students— Alva, Lucas and Anni (from Germany) and Pedro (from Brazil).
The fifth video in the series is of Xu Xi, a Hong Kong writer and educator. The students originally published this interview in a seven-art series, but I recently combined the videos into one.
About the Music
In addition to supervising the Dreamers projects, I helped by composing and producing the background music. The music in the background of the main Dreamers video has become my most popular song. You can preview and download more of my background music here: https://longzijun.wordpress.com/2010/05/28/free-background-music/
If your students do work on a 50 People 1 Question video or oral history project, let me know. I’d love to see their work.
~by Stephen Richards (longzijun)
Return to Education (Projects, Resources & Articles)